[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[amsat-bb:74915] Re: AO-40 Update, 2004-02-03
> Part of this waiting game is knowing what the exact cells are composed of
>that you are waiting to open, based on your description and pictures of the
>main and aux banks,
><http://www.amsat.org/amsat/features/p3dpix2/photo4.jpg>http://www.amsat.org/amsat/features/p3dpix2/photo4.jpg
>
>,we can see that the cells are cylindrical.
>
> Yet it seems that what was built differs from what was planned,
><http://www.amsat.org/amsat/sats/phase3d/thermal.html#Power>http://www.amsat.org/amsat/sats/phase3d/thermal.html#Power
>, I quote..
>" The Main Battery is composed of 20 cells of 40 Ahr capacity, for a 22-28
>VDC
>supply. These rectangular cells are from a terrestrial application, but have
>been very well characterized for space service." rectangular cells....
>So I'm still wondering since it looks like the type of main battery was
>changed, can anyone tell all of use what is really flying? what's is the
>brand and model of the cells.
Unless I put <conjecture></conjecture> around my posts, you can consider
them to be fact. The batteries seen in that very old picture were used for
ground test work, something you don't want to use the flight batteries
for. The flight batteries are as I have stated, rectangular, 40 amp/hour,
3 packs, metal enclosure, etc. I was there at the final integration in
Kourou and saw them in place. I believe I remember who made the batteries,
but I'll look it up to be sure. The model number should be available as
well. Likewise, some older pictures or drawings may show three aux.
battery. packs. There were only two at launch.
[another post]
>Lets say all our present hope if futile and the sat drifts for 10 years
>and then something breaks loose and
>it does an Ao-7 on us. Without the batteries and with the panels closed
>will there be enough power to
>drive the wheels to right the bird again?
If you look back at my last post, I indicated that it would take 4 years to
drop from 3.5 RPM to 3.0 RPM. It will take slightly longer to drop from
3.0 to 2.5 RPM and slightly longer still to drop from 2.5 to 2.0 RPM....
(>12 years for 3.5 -> 2.0 RPM), and we can still magnetorque at even 1.5
RPM (or possibly lower if we use some different software). So even 16
years out we should still be spin stabilized with enough RPM to trigger the
magnetorquers. By then our ME/heading estimates, etc. will have diverged
greatly from reality, but it doesn't really matter. We'll be spinning, and
based on a few orbital determinations of optimum signal, direct squint
measurement, earth sensors, solar angle, pictures, etc, we would be able to
find our attitude and torque back to where we want to go. There is no
reason to use the momentum wheels for this purpose. They were designed for
3-axis mode. As long as the satellite is spinning ANY, they can only
slightly change the spin rate, they cannot change the attitude when the
satellite is spin stabilized. When we first encountered problems with the
batteries, we changed the spin rate from 2.5 to 3.5 RPM as a safety
precaution. This turned out to be a very good move.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Stacey E. Mills, W4SM WWW: http://www.keplerian.com
Charlottesville, VA PGP key: http://www.keplerian.com/key
________________________________________________________________________
----
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxxxxxxx Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@xxxxxxxxx